[2025] FWC 2323
Citation: [2025] FWC 2323
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant was found to be unfairly dismissed from his employment as a panel beater with Sydney Luxury Smash Repairs Pty Ltd (SLSR) on 24 October 2024. He was awarded $5,441.64 less taxation, plus superannuation of $625.79. the Applicant sought costs due to SLSR’s actions during the proceedings, including settlement negotiations and production order applications. SLSR, in turn, claimed the Applicant and his legal representatives acted unreasonably.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission ordered SLSR to pay the Applicant’s costs. The Commissioner found SLSR acted unreasonably in several ways, including failing to confirm settlement offers, pursuing production orders without reasonable prospects of success, and not having a representative available for a hearing. The Commissioner considered the principles outlined in sections 400A, 401, and 611 of the Fair Work Act 2009 regarding costs orders.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully consider settlement offers and provide clear reasons for rejecting them. Pursuing legal action, particularly production orders, requires a reasonable prospect of success. Ensuring key personnel are available for hearings is crucial to avoid delays and increased costs.
What it means for employees
Employees should document settlement negotiations and any unreasonable behaviour by the Respondent during legal proceedings. Seeking legal advice is important to understand rights and options when facing unfair dismissal or other workplace disputes.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2323.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →