[2025] FWC 2289
Citation: [2025] FWC 2289
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant sought to extend the time to file a claim alleging unfair dismissal against his former employer, Electra Lift Co. His employment ended in October 2022, and he filed his application almost two and a half years later. Electra Lift Co. argued the Applicant resigned and opposed the extension. the Applicant attributed the delay to a lack of awareness of his workplace rights and concerns about potential retribution. He also admitted to using ChatGPT to prepare his application, which contained inaccurate legal advice.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission refused to extend the time for the Applicant to file his application. The Deputy President found the delay of 919 days was excessive and the Applicant's reliance on ChatGPT did not constitute exceptional circumstances. The Commission considered the prejudice to the Respondent and the merits of the claim, which were deemed unmeritorious. The application was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that significant delays in lodging claims can be detrimental to their ability to defend against them. It is important to maintain records and be prepared to respond to claims, even if they are filed long after the events in question. The case highlights the risks of relying on unverified information, even from AI tools, when making legal decisions.
What it means for employees
Employees must adhere to strict time limits when filing claims with the Fair Work Commission. Ignorance of these time limits is not a valid reason for delay. Employees should seek professional legal advice rather than relying on artificial intelligence for legal guidance.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2289.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →