Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 July 2025

[2025] FWC 1763

Citation: [2025] FWC 1763

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

Shaun Turner was dismissed from his role as a Sweeper Driver at Darebin City Council in June 2024. The dismissal followed allegations that he made disrespectful comments during a toolbox meeting, including questioning the necessity of an Acknowledgement of Country and making derogatory remarks about a colleague. Turner denied the allegations and claimed the investigation lacked procedural fairness, alleging entrapment by the complainant. The Council asserted Turner had previously received a final warning for similar behavior. Turner initiated an unfair dismissal claim.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found Turner's dismissal was unfair. The Commission determined there was a valid reason for the dismissal, relating to Turner’s conduct, but the dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable. The Council incorrectly asserted Turner confirmed his comments during a meeting. The Commission will now determine the appropriate remedy for Turner.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure investigations into employee conduct are fair and procedural. This includes providing employees with all relevant information, including the identity of the complainant and witness statements. Incorrectly stating facts during disciplinary processes can undermine the validity of a dismissal.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to a fair investigation process when facing disciplinary action. Employees should document their responses to allegations and raise concerns about procedural fairness promptly.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1763.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases