[2025] FWC 1554
Citation: [2025] FWC 1554
What happened
the Applicant was dismissed from her role as a science laboratory technician at St Columba’s College Ltd after forcefully slapping a student’s hand during a class. the Applicant claims the dismissal was disproportionate and the process unfair, seeking compensation. The incident was captured on video and reported to the Commission for Children and Young People (CCYP). The College alleges the Applicant was involved in tense conversations with students and verbally abused the student. the Applicant argues she was not properly informed of the allegations and that the College did not follow proper procedures outlined in the Catholic Education Multi Enterprise Agreement.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commissioner found that the Applicant did slap the student’s hand and that the slap was unwarranted. The Commissioner found the College had a clear motivation for the dismissal, which was the Applicant’s conduct. While some allegations against the Applicant were unsubstantiated, the Commissioner found the slap itself was a serious breach of school policy and child safety obligations. The Commissioner noted the Applicant’s explanation for the slap was inconsistent.
What it means for employers
Employers have a responsibility to ensure staff adhere to child safety policies and procedures. Failing to address serious breaches of these policies, such as physical contact with students, can lead to disciplinary action, including dismissal. Thorough investigation and adherence to contractual obligations and enterprise agreements are crucial in handling such situations.
What it means for employees
Employees must comply with workplace policies, including those related to child safety. Providing inconsistent explanations for actions can undermine credibility and impact the outcome of investigations. Understanding the seriousness of workplace conduct and its potential consequences is essential.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1554.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →