Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 27 February 2025

[2025] FWC 150

Citation: [2025] FWC 150

At a glance

Penalty
$4,146
Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant was dismissed from her role as a restaurant front of house manager at Glenpickle Pty Ltd in September 2024. the Applicant claimed she was told Glenpickle would sponsor her visa and then dismissed after raising the issue with the owner, Steven Kafrouni, and being accused of crossing a general manager, Arthur Atlas. Glenpickle stated the Applicant’s performance was unsatisfactory and she received warnings, and that she was dismissed due to poor performance. the Applicant denied receiving warnings and disputed the allegations of poor performance.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair. The Commissioner accepted the Applicant’s oral evidence and found there was no valid reason for her dismissal. Reinstatement was deemed inappropriate due to her visa status. Compensation of $4146.15 (gross) plus $476.81 in superannuation was ordered, to be paid within 28 days. This amount reflects lost earnings between her dismissal and visa expiry, less earnings from subsequent employment.

What it means for employers

Employers must have valid reasons for dismissal and provide employees with an opportunity to respond to those reasons. Failing to do so can result in an unfair dismissal finding and compensation orders. It is crucial to document performance concerns and provide warnings before termination.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to a valid reason and opportunity to respond before being dismissed. If you believe your dismissal was unfair, you can apply to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationlong-service-leaveparental-leavesexual-harassment

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc150.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases