Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 27 February 2025

[2025] FWC 150

Citation: [2025] FWC 150

At a glance

Penalty
$4,146
Employees affected
1

What happened

Sofia Mistrioti was dismissed from her role as a restaurant front of house manager at Glenpickle Pty Ltd in September 2024. Ms Mistrioti claimed she was told Glenpickle would sponsor her visa and then dismissed after raising the issue with the owner, Steven Kafrouni, and being accused of crossing a general manager, Arthur Atlas. Glenpickle stated Ms Mistrioti’s performance was unsatisfactory and she received warnings, and that she was dismissed due to poor performance. Ms Mistrioti denied receiving warnings and disputed the allegations of poor performance.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found Ms Mistrioti’s dismissal was unfair. The Commission accepted Ms Mistrioti’s oral evidence and found there was no valid reason for her dismissal. Reinstatement was deemed inappropriate due to her visa status. Compensation of $4146.15 (gross) plus $476.81 in superannuation was ordered, to be paid within 28 days. This amount reflects lost earnings between her dismissal and visa expiry, less earnings from subsequent employment.

What it means for employers

Employers must have valid reasons for dismissal and provide employees with an opportunity to respond to those reasons. Failing to do so can result in an unfair dismissal finding and compensation orders. It is crucial to document performance concerns and provide warnings before termination.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to a valid reason and opportunity to respond before being dismissed. If you believe your dismissal was unfair, you can apply to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationlong-service-leaveparental-leavesexual-harassment

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc150.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases