[2025] FWC 1498
Citation: [2025] FWC 1498
What happened
the Applicant was terminated from his role as Human Resources Manager at Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools Ltd (MACS) on April 11, 2025. He filed an application for unfair dismissal on May 4, 2025, two days past the 21-day deadline. MACS objected to the application, arguing the delay was not due to exceptional circumstances. the Applicant alleges misconduct led to his dismissal, which MACS denies, claiming he falsified a variation to his employment contract for financial gain. the Applicant’s representative miscalculated the deadline, believing he had until May 5th due to a public holiday.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted the Applicant an extension of time to file his unfair dismissal application. the Commissioner found that the representative’s miscalculation, while not automatically exceptional, constituted representative error where the Applicant had given clear instructions and taken steps to follow up. The Commission considered factors like the reason for the delay, the Applicant’s awareness of the dismissal, actions taken to dispute it, potential prejudice to MACS, the merits of the application, and fairness. The Commission noted the Applicant’s proactive communication with his representative.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of deadlines for lodging claims, particularly unfair dismissal applications. While representative error can be a factor in granting extensions, employers can highlight employee responsibility in ensuring claims are filed promptly. Clear communication and documentation of dismissal reasons are also crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of the 21-day deadline for lodging unfair dismissal applications. If using a representative, employees should actively monitor the progress of their claim and confirm deadlines to avoid delays. Taking steps to follow up with representatives demonstrates proactive engagement.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1498.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →