[2025] FWC 1498
Citation: [2025] FWC 1498
What happened
Mr Greg Pargeter was terminated from his role as Human Resources Manager at Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools Ltd (MACS) on April 11, 2025. He filed an application for unfair dismissal on May 4, 2025, two days past the 21-day deadline. MACS objected to the application, arguing the delay was not due to exceptional circumstances. Mr Pargeter alleges misconduct led to his dismissal, which MACS denies, claiming he falsified a variation to his employment contract for financial gain. Mr Pargeter’s representative, Mr Justin Cooney, miscalculated the deadline, believing he had until May 5th due to a public holiday.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted Mr Pargeter an extension of time to file his unfair dismissal application. Commissioner Redford found that Mr Cooney’s miscalculation, while not automatically exceptional, constituted representative error where Mr Pargeter had given clear instructions and taken steps to follow up. The Commission considered factors like the reason for the delay, Mr Pargeter’s awareness of the dismissal, actions taken to dispute it, potential prejudice to MACS, the merits of the application, and fairness. The Commission noted Mr Pargeter’s proactive communication with his representative.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of deadlines for lodging claims, particularly unfair dismissal applications. While representative error can be a factor in granting extensions, employers can highlight employee responsibility in ensuring claims are filed promptly. Clear communication and documentation of dismissal reasons are also crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of the 21-day deadline for lodging unfair dismissal applications. If using a representative, employees should actively monitor the progress of their claim and confirm deadlines to avoid delays. Taking steps to follow up with representatives demonstrates proactive engagement.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1498.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →