[2025] FWC 1486
What happened
The Construction, Forestry, and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) sought a right of entry permit for its official, the Applicant. The Applicant was convicted in 2014 of armed robbery while struggling with drug addiction. He served prison time, underwent rehabilitation, and has since worked in construction and for the CFMEU. He has previously held an entry permit under Western Australian law. He has also faced minor convictions for breaching police orders and other offenses. The CFMEU's administrator, the Second Respondent, supported the application despite the Applicant’s past offenses.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President issued a right of entry permit to the Applicant. While acknowledging the seriousness of the Applicant’s past criminal convictions, the Deputy President found he had demonstrated significant rehabilitation and a commitment to being a law-abiding citizen. The decision considered factors like the Applicant's training, his work history, and the support from the CFMEU. The Deputy President stated the Applicant is a 'different man' from when he committed the offenses and is a fit and proper person to hold a permit.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that the Fair Work Commission can consider rehabilitation and changed circumstances when assessing an individual’s suitability for a union official role, even with a criminal record. This highlights the importance of assessing individuals based on their current conduct and potential for future contributions.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that union officials can obtain right of entry permits, even with a history of criminal offenses, if they demonstrate rehabilitation and a commitment to responsible conduct. This decision underscores the Commission's focus on individual circumstances and potential for positive change.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.