[2025] FWC 1177
What happened
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) applied for entry permits for Joshua Thompson and Dylan Howard, who are employed as an organiser and Civil and Regional Construction Co-Ordinator respectively. Thompson and Howard are respondents in ongoing Federal Court proceedings (Matter No. QUD245/2024) related to alleged breaches of workplace laws. BMD Constructions Pty Ltd is the applicant in the Federal Court proceedings. The Fair Work Ombudsman raised concerns about Howard’s conduct, referencing video footage alleging ‘shirtfronting’ and threatening language. The CFMEU Administrator refuted these claims. The Ombudsman subsequently resolved their concerns and did not participate in the hearing.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) issued entry permits to Joshua Thompson and Dylan Howard. The FWC considered the ‘permit qualification matters’ outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. While acknowledging the ongoing Federal Court proceedings, the FWC found Thompson and Howard had received appropriate training and that other relevant matters did not preclude them from holding permits. The FWC noted the Ombudsman’s resolution of concerns regarding Howard’s conduct and proceeded based on this.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that allegations of misconduct against union officials are considered when assessing their suitability for entry permits. While the FWC ultimately found the individuals fit and proper, the proceedings were a relevant factor. Employers involved in disputes with unions should document any incidents and share relevant information with the Fair Work Ombudsman.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that their conduct, both inside and outside of work, can be considered when determining their suitability to hold union official positions. Union officials should be mindful of their behaviour and ensure it aligns with the responsibilities of a permit holder.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.