[2024] FWCFB 331
Citation: [2024] FWCFB 331
What happened
Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd (Qube) sought to vary two enterprise agreements, the QUBE Logistics (Rail) Train Crew and RTBU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015 (2015 Agreement) and its replacement, the 2019 Agreement. The RTBU commenced legal proceedings in the Federal Court alleging Qube had not paid penalty rates and allowances under the Rail Industry Award 2010, which was incorporated into the agreements. Qube sought variations to remove the source of these entitlements. The agreements cover Qube and its employees in New South Wales and incorporate the Rail Industry Award 2010, with clauses defining ‘Hourly Rate’ and ‘Ordinary Hours.’
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench (FWCFB) granted permission to appeal a decision and subsequently dismissed the appeal against a decision of Deputy President Cross. Deputy President Cross had found Qube lacked standing to bring the application regarding the 2015 Agreement and declined to exercise discretion to vary either agreement. The FWCFB found no errors of law and affirmed the original decision. The RTBU’s notice of contention was not considered due to the appeal outcome.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they have standing to bring applications to vary enterprise agreements. They must also provide reliable evidence and avoid presenting evidence that could be perceived as misleading. The decision highlights the importance of accurately reflecting the intentions of parties during enterprise agreement negotiations and the potential consequences of attempting to retrospectively alter agreements to avoid legal claims.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwcfb331.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →