[2024] FWC 1717
Citation: [2024] FWC 1717
What happened
Mr Pece Calovski was dismissed from Opal Packaging Australia Pty Ltd after a forklift incident on June 27, 2023. He alleges the dismissal was unfair and seeks reinstatement. The incident involved damage to property and potential for injury. The company suspended Calovski from forklift duties and later terminated his employment, citing misconduct related to his explanation of the incident and a perceived unwillingness to accept responsibility. Calovski maintained he applied the brakes, which failed. The company relied on reports from Adapt-A-Lift and SafeWork NSW, which contradicted Calovski's account. A hearing was held with witnesses giving evidence.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered whether Mr Calovski was protected from unfair dismissal and, if so, whether the dismissal was unfair. The Commission granted Opal Packaging Australia Pty Ltd permission to be represented by a lawyer due to the complexity of the case. The decision regarding the unfair dismissal claim is pending, as the hearing involved contested facts and required detailed examination of evidence. The Commission noted the complexity of the matter involved interaction with the work health and safety regime and a significant volume of materials and witnesses.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure investigations into workplace incidents are thorough, impartial, and consider all available evidence. They should provide employees with opportunities to respond to allegations and ensure any reliance on third-party reports is critically assessed. The Commission’s decision to grant representation highlights the importance of being prepared for complex cases involving safety incidents and legal representation.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to raise concerns about workplace safety and should document their accounts of incidents. If an employer’s investigation appears biased or relies on questionable information, employees should raise those concerns. Employees are entitled to legal representation in Fair Work Commission proceedings.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc1717.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →