[2024] FWC 1522
Citation: [2024] FWC 1522
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
Lina Ramirez was dismissed from her part-time position as a food and beverage attendant at Cafetal Coffee Company, owned by Gonva Group Pty Ltd, on October 28, 2023, via email. The dismissal followed disagreements about public holiday pay and Ms. Ramirez's questioning of the business owner, Mr. Gonzalez, in staff meetings. Ms. Ramirez had previously raised concerns about public holiday pay with a business partner of Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Valencia. Mr. Gonzalez alleged serious misconduct, including recording conversations and excessive mobile phone use during work hours. Ms. Ramirez sought compensation for unfair dismissal and claimed she was willing to transition to a casual role to retain her Monday shifts.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found Gonva Group Pty Ltd did not comply with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code and unfairly dismissed Ms. Ramirez. The Commission determined the dismissal was unfair and ordered compensation. The Commission considered evidence from both parties, including translations of Spanish communications. The decision hinged on the failure to comply with the Code, which triggered a review of the merits of the dismissal.
What it means for employers
Employers, particularly small businesses, must adhere to the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code when dismissing employees. Failure to do so can lead to jurisdictional objections and potential liability for unfair dismissal. Employers should ensure clear communication and documentation regarding employment conditions, including pay for public holidays, and address employee concerns respectfully.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to raise concerns about workplace practices, such as pay entitlements, without fear of reprisal. If an employer fails to comply with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code, employees may be entitled to remedies for unfair dismissal.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc1522.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →