[2023] FWCFB 103
Citation: [2023] FWCFB 103
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 4
- Awards cited
- MA000042
What happened
Specialised Mine Services Pty Ltd (SMS) sought approval for an Enterprise Agreement (SMS Agreement) covering four casual employees. The Mining and Energy Union (MEU) appealed a previous decision approving the agreement, raising concerns about how the agreement was made and whether it genuinely reflected employee agreement. The MEU questioned the involvement of company directors, the Applicant and the Second Respondent, in creating the agreement and whether the employees were properly covered by another enterprise agreement (Nortek Agreement). They also raised concerns about the explanation of the agreement's terms to employees and whether it passed the 'better off overall test'. The Deputy President initially refused to provide unredacted documents related to the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench (FWCFB) granted permission to appeal, upheld the appeal, and quashed the decision approving the SMS Agreement. The FWC found the Deputy President erred by not providing unredacted documents to the MEU, denying procedural fairness and failing to consider relevant principles regarding genuine agreement. The FWC also found the Deputy President did not adequately consider the relationship between the SMS Agreement and the Nortek Agreement. Further evidence was allowed, which supported the MEU's concerns. The application for approval of the SMS Agreement was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers must be transparent in the process of creating enterprise agreements. Failing to disclose relevant information can lead to decisions being overturned and agreements being rejected. Employers should ensure all employees understand the terms of an agreement and its implications, and that the agreement genuinely reflects their agreement. The close relationship between companies needs to be considered when assessing enterprise agreements.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to access information related to enterprise agreement applications. Unions play a vital role in ensuring fairness and transparency in the agreement-making process. Employees should be aware of their rights and seek assistance from their union if they have concerns about an enterprise agreement.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwcfb103.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →