Right to Disconnect: 6 Months On — What's Changed in Australian Workplaces
The right to disconnect laws have been in effect for 6 months. Here's how they're working in practice, key cases, employer compliance, and what employees need to know about their rights.
What is the right to disconnect?
The right to disconnect gives employees the right to refuse to monitor, read, or respond to contact (or attempted contact) from their employer or a third party related to their work outside of their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable. The right was introduced through the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Act 2024 and took effect for non-small-business employees on 26 August 2024, with small business employees (employers with fewer than 15 employees) covered from 26 August 2025. This means all Australian employees covered by the national workplace relations system now have this right. The right applies to all forms of contact — phone calls, text messages, emails, messaging apps (Slack, Teams, WhatsApp), and any other communication platform. It does not prevent employers from sending communications outside hours — it protects the employee's right not to respond until their next working period. The key test is reasonableness: an employee's refusal to respond must not be unreasonable, considering factors like the reason for the contact, the level of disruption, whether the employee is compensated for being available, and the nature of the employee's role.
How the laws have played out in practice
Six months since the right extended to small business employees (and 18 months since it began for larger employers), the practical impact has been more about cultural shift than legal enforcement. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has received a modest number of formal disputes — approximately 120 applications in the first year, with the majority resolved through conciliation rather than contested hearings. Most cases have involved employees in professional or managerial roles where the boundaries between work and personal time had been particularly blurred: marketing managers expected to monitor social media accounts on weekends, IT staff receiving after-hours system alerts, and sales teams receiving client communications via personal phones outside hours. The FWC has taken a balanced approach in its early decisions, emphasising that the right is not absolute and must be weighed against the employer's operational needs. In one notable case, the FWC found that a finance manager's refusal to respond to an email at 9pm about a client deadline the following morning was unreasonable given they were senior, well-compensated, and the contact was genuinely urgent. In another case, a retail store manager who was regularly called by staff at 6am about rostering queries was found to have reasonably refused contact, as the issues were routine and could wait until their shift started.
What counts as 'unreasonable' refusal
The Fair Work Act sets out factors that the FWC must consider when determining whether an employee's refusal to respond is unreasonable. These include: the reason for the contact or attempted contact — genuine emergencies or time-sensitive operational matters weigh in favour of response being reasonable, while routine administrative queries do not. The method of contact and level of disruption — a single email that sits in an inbox is less disruptive than repeated phone calls. Whether the employee is compensated for being available outside hours — if you receive an on-call allowance or your contract includes availability provisions, refusing to respond is more likely to be considered unreasonable. The nature of the employee's role and level of responsibility — senior managers and executives generally have higher expectations of availability than frontline workers. The employee's personal circumstances — caring responsibilities, health conditions, or other commitments can make after-hours contact more burdensome. Importantly, the burden of proof sits with the employer to show that the refusal was unreasonable, not with the employee to justify their refusal. The FWC has also noted that habitual or systemic after-hours contact — even if each individual instance might seem minor — can cumulatively amount to an unreasonable pattern that employees are entitled to push back on.
Employer obligations and compliance steps
Employers have several obligations under the right to disconnect provisions. While there is no requirement to create a standalone right to disconnect policy, it is strongly recommended. A good policy should clearly define working hours and when employees are expected to be available, identify any roles that have legitimate on-call or availability requirements (with appropriate compensation), establish protocols for genuine emergencies and who has authority to escalate after-hours, set expectations about response times for non-urgent communications sent outside hours, and outline the dispute resolution process if disagreements arise. Employers should also review their existing contracts and enterprise agreements to ensure consistency with the new right. If employment contracts include clauses requiring employees to be available outside hours, these should be reviewed to ensure they are reasonable and include appropriate compensation. Training managers is critical — many after-hours contact issues arise from individual manager behaviour rather than organisational policy. Managers should be trained to schedule emails for delivery during work hours (most email platforms support this), distinguish between urgent and routine matters before making contact, and respect boundaries consistently rather than treating after-hours availability as a test of commitment. The FWC can issue stop orders if an employer unreasonably requires employees to respond outside hours, and penalties of up to $18,780 per contravention for individuals and $93,900 for companies can apply.
Impact on different industries and roles
The right to disconnect has had varying impacts across industries. In professional services (accounting, law, consulting), where long hours and after-hours client contact have been deeply ingrained in the culture, the shift has been most pronounced. Many firms have implemented 'email delay' systems that hold non-urgent emails until the next business day, and some have appointed after-hours contact coordinators who triage incoming matters and only escalate genuine emergencies. In healthcare and emergency services, the right interacts with existing on-call arrangements, and most workers in these sectors have established on-call rosters with appropriate compensation — the right to disconnect does not change these arrangements. In retail and hospitality, the main impact has been on manager-level employees who were previously expected to handle staff queries (sick calls, rostering questions, stock issues) outside their own rostered hours. Many businesses have responded by implementing automated rostering systems and establishing clear escalation protocols that reduce the need for manager intervention outside hours. In education, teachers and academics have welcomed the right as a boundary against the creep of parent emails, student queries, and administrative communications into evenings and weekends. In the gig economy and for contractors, the right does not apply — it covers employees only, leaving independent contractors to manage their own availability boundaries.
What employees should do if their rights are breached
If you believe your employer is unreasonably requiring you to respond to after-hours contact, there is a clear process to follow. First, raise the issue directly with your employer or manager — many breaches are unintentional and can be resolved through a conversation about expectations and boundaries. Document the pattern of after-hours contact: keep a log of dates, times, method of contact, and the nature of the communication. Note whether the contact was genuinely urgent or could have waited until working hours. Second, if direct resolution does not work, you can lodge a dispute with the Fair Work Commission. The FWC will first attempt to resolve the matter through conciliation — a confidential, informal process where a conciliator helps both parties reach an agreement. If conciliation fails, the FWC can make binding orders, including stop orders preventing the employer from continuing the unreasonable contact pattern. Third, if you experience adverse action (demotion, reduced hours, dismissal, or other detriment) because you exercised your right to disconnect, this may constitute a general protections breach under section 340 of the Fair Work Act, which carries significant penalties and can support a compensation claim. Throughout the process, union members can seek support from their union delegate or organiser, and non-union employees can seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman's information line.
Tips for making the right to disconnect work
For the right to disconnect to work effectively for both employers and employees, communication and reasonable expectations are essential. For employees: set clear boundaries by communicating your working hours to colleagues and clients, use auto-replies outside hours that indicate when you will respond, and separate work and personal communication channels where possible (avoid using personal phone numbers for work). For employers: lead by example — if senior leaders send emails at midnight, it sets a cultural expectation regardless of what the policy says. Use scheduling tools to send communications during business hours, establish clear emergency escalation paths so routine matters do not get elevated to after-hours contact, and compensate employees appropriately if their role genuinely requires after-hours availability. For both parties: remember that the right to disconnect is about reasonableness, not rigidity. A culture where employees feel safe to not respond to non-urgent matters outside hours benefits everyone — research consistently shows that employees who can genuinely switch off are more productive, more engaged, and less likely to burn out or resign. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare estimates that work-related stress costs the Australian economy over $10 billion per year in lost productivity, absenteeism, and healthcare costs — and blurred work-life boundaries are a major contributor.
Try these free tools
Official resources
General information and estimates only — not legal, financial, or tax advice. Always verify with the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified professional.
Related articles
Australia's right to disconnect law explained. Covers the Fair Work Amendment Act 2024 provisions, which employers are covered, reasonable contact exceptions, how to exercise your right, and Fair Work Commission dispute orders.
Right to Disconnect Australia — Can I Ignore My Boss After Hours? (2026 Law)Australia's right to disconnect law started 26 August 2024. Know when you can legally ignore your boss outside work hours, who it applies to, and what counts as an unreasonable refusal.
Right to Disconnect Australia — What the New Law Means for YouAustralia's right to disconnect law lets employees refuse unreasonable out-of-hours contact. Learn who it covers, what counts as unreasonable, and how the FWC enforces it.
Right to Disconnect Law 2026: Can My Boss Contact Me After Hours?Australia's right to disconnect law now covers ALL employers from Feb 2026. You can refuse unreasonable after-hours contact. See what counts as unreasonable and how to enforce it.